4.7 Article

Grape Exosome-like Nanoparticles Induce Intestinal Stem Cells and Protect Mice From DSS-Induced Colitis

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 1345-1357

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2013.64

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1CA137037, R01CA107181, RO1AT004294, RO1CA116092]
  2. Louisville Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC) Merit Review Grants
  3. Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation [EPS 0236913, DBI 0521587, DBI 1228622, MCB 0920663]
  5. Kansas Technology Enterprise Corporation
  6. K-IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research Excellence (INBRE) of National Institute of Health [P20RR16475]
  7. Kansas State University
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences
  9. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1228622] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences [0920663] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food-derived exosome-like nanoparticles pass through the intestinal tract throughout our lives, but little is known about their impact or function. Here, as a proof of concept, we show that the cells targeted by grape exosome-like nanoparticles (GELNs) are intestinal stem cells whose responses underlie the GELN-mediated intestinal tissue remodeling and protection against dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis. This finding is further supported by the fact that coculturing of crypt or sorted Lgr5(+) stem cells with GELNs markedly improved organoid formation. GELN lipids play a role in induction of Lgr5(+) stem cells, and the liposome-like nanoparticles (LLNs) assembled with lipids from GELNs are required for in vivo targeting of intestinal stem cells. Blocking beta-catenin-mediated signaling pathways of GELN recipient cells attenuates the production of Lgr5(+) stem cells. Thus, GELNs not only modulate intestinal tissue renewal processes, but can participate in the remodeling of it in response to pathological triggers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据