4.7 Article

Functional Cloning of Recurrence-specific Antigens Identifies Molecular Targets to Treat Tumor Relapse

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 1507-1516

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2013.116

关键词

-

资金

  1. Richard M Schulze Family Foundation
  2. Mayo Foundation
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. National Institute of Health [R01CA107082, R01CA130878, R01CA132734]
  5. Cancer Research UK [13244] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aggressive regrowth of recurrent tumors following treatment-induced dormancy represents a major clinical challenge for treatment of malignant disease. We reported previously that recurrent prostate tumors, which underwent complete macroscopic regression followed by aggressive regrowth, could be cured with a vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-expressed cDNA library derived from recurrent tumor cells. By screening the protective, recurrence-derived VSV-cDNA library, here we identify topoisomerase-II alpha (TOPO-II alpha) as a recurrence-specific tumor antigen against which tolerance can be broken. Tumor recurrences, in two different types of tumor (prostate and melanoma), which had evaded two different frontline treatments (immunotherapy or chemotherapy), significantly overexpressed TOPO-II alpha compared with their primary tumor counterparts, which conferred a novel sensitivity to doxorubicin (DOX) chemotherapy upon the recurrent tumors. This was exploited in vivo using combination therapies to cure mice, which would otherwise have relapsed, after suboptimal primary therapy in both models. Our data show that recurrent tumors-across histologies and primary treatments-express distinct antigens compared with the primary tumor which can be identified using the VSV-cDNA library technology. These results suggest that it may be possible to design a few common second-line therapies against a variety of tumor recurrences, in some cases using agents with no obvious activity against the primary tumor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据