4.6 Article

Selection of shape parameters that differentiate sand grains, based on the automatic analysis of two-dimensional images

期刊

SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
卷 327, 期 -, 页码 14-20

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2015.07.007

关键词

Optical microscopy; Image analysis; Shape of sand grains; Krumbein method

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A grain shape analysis of sandy deposits has implications for determining the processes that affect grain shape. So far, most methods of carrying out a grain shape analysis are based on the subjective estimation of the researcher. The purpose of this study is to indicate the shape parameter/parameters that best differentiate sand grains, and to compare the results with those that have been obtained by the Krumbein method. We determined the shape parameters of sand grains (size range from 0.71 mm to 1 mm) using photos of two-dimensional images of particle projections onto a plane. The photos were taken under an optical microscope and were then subjected to an image analysis. We selected six shape parameters that best differentiate the studied sand grains, based on the criteria of: i) the monotonicity of parameter value, which changed depending on the categorization of the grains to the successive Krumbein roundness classes, and ii) the statistical significance of differences between the optical parameter values in the individual Krumbein classes. We selected three circularity parameters (theta(1), theta(4) and theta(5)) and three surface structure parameters (kappa(3), kappa(4) and kappa(6)). None of these shape parameters allowed the direct categorization of a particle into a particular Krumbein roundness class. Nevertheless, despite the fact that an unambiguous characterization of deposits is not possible, this method can be helpful in identifying the origin of deposits. Moreover, it is possible to develop more advanced methods (e.g., based on artificial intelligence tools), which would allow an unambiguous categorization based on the determined shape parameters. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据