4.7 Article

Abrogation of Local Cancer Recurrence After Radiofrequency Ablation by Dendritic Cell-based Hyperthermic Tumor Vaccine

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 2049-2057

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2009.221

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871293, 30921006, 30620130434]
  2. Chinese National Programs for High Technology Research and Development [2007AA02Z166, 2006AA02A310]
  3. Chinese National Key Project [2008ZX10002-020]
  4. Shanghai Venus and Dawn Scheme for Young Scholars [07QA14070, 07SG45, 06DZ22025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Local recurrence is a therapeutic challenge for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treatment of small solid focal malignancies. Here we show that RFA induced heat shock proteins (HSPs) expression and high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) translocation in xenografted melanoma, which might create a proinflammatory microenvironment that favors tumor antigen presentation and activation of the effector T cells. On this basis, we investigate whether a prime-boost strategy combining a prime with heat-shocked tumor cell lysate-pulsed dendritic cell (HT-DC) followed by an in situ boost with radiofrequency thermal ablation can prevent local tumor recurrence. The combination treatment with HT-DC and RFA showed potent antitumor effects, with >= 90% of tumor recurrence abrogated following RFA treatment. By contrast, prevaccination with unheated tumor lysate-pulsed DC had little effect on tumor relapse. Analysis of the underlying mechanism revealed that splenocytes from mice treated with HT-DC plus RFA contained significantly more tumor-specific, IFN-gamma-secreting T cells compared with control groups. Moreover, adoptive transfer of splenocytes from successfully treated tumor-free mice protected naive animals from tumor recurrence following RFA, and this was mediated mainly by CD8(+) T cells. Therefore, the optimal priming for the DC vaccination before RFA is important for boosting antigen-specific T cell responses and prevention of cancer recurrence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据