4.7 Article

Engineering and selection of shuffled AAV genomes: A new strategy for producing targeted biological nanoparticles

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 1252-1260

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2008.100

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL51818, P01 HL051818] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI072176, R01 AI072176-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR055712] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS035633, NS59518, NS35633, R21 NS059518] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a DNA shuffling-based approach for developing cell type-specific vectors through directed evolution. Capsid genomes of adeno-associated virus (AAV) sero-types 1-9 were randomly fragmented and reassembled using PCR to generate a chimeric capsid library. A single infectious clone (chimeric-1829) containing genome fragments from AAV1, 2, 8, and 9 was isolated from an integrin minus hamster melanoma cell line previously shown to have low permissiveness to AAV. Molecular modeling studies suggest that AAV2 contributes to surface loops at the icosahedral threefold axis of symmetry, while AAV1 and 9 contribute to two- and fivefold symmetry interactions, respectively. The C-terminal domain (AAV9) was identified as a critical structural determinant of melanoma tropism through rational mutagenesis. Chimeric-1829 utilizes heparan sulfate as a primary receptor and transduces melanoma cells more efficiently than all serotypes. Further, chimeric-1829 demonstrates altered tropism in rodent skeletal muscle, liver, and brain including nonhuman primates. We determined a unique immunological profile based on neutralizing antibody (NAb) titer and crossreactivity studies strongly supporting isolation of a synthetic laboratory-derived capsid variant. Application of this technology to alternative cell/tissue types using AAV or other viral capsid sequences is likely to yield a new class of biological nanoparticles as vectors for human gene transfer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据