4.6 Article

Efficient search, mapping, and optimization of multi-protein genetic systems in diverse bacteria

期刊

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20134955

关键词

biophysical models; pathway optimization; SEAMAPs; synthetic biology

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0074]
  2. NSF [CBET-1253641]
  3. DARPA
  4. Penn State Institute for the Energy and the Environment
  5. NSF
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1253641] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing predictive models of multi-protein genetic systems to understand and optimize their behavior remains a combinatorial challenge, particularly when measurement throughput is limited. We developed a computational approach to build predictive models and identify optimal sequences and expression levels, while circumventing combinatorial explosion. Maximally informative genetic system variants were first designed by the RBS Library Calculator, an algorithm to design sequences for efficiently searching a multi-protein expression space across a > 10,000-fold range with tailored search parameters and well-predicted translation rates. We validated the algorithm's predictions by characterizing 646 genetic system variants, encoded in plasmids and genomes, expressed in six gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial hosts. We then combined the search algorithm with system-level kinetic modeling, requiring the construction and characterization of 73 variants to build a sequence-expression-activity map (SEAMAP) for a biosynthesis pathway. Using model predictions, we designed and characterized 47 additional pathway variants to navigate its activity space, find optimal expression regions with desired activity response curves, and relieve rate-limiting steps in metabolism. Creating sequence-expression-activity maps accelerates the optimization of many protein systems and allows previous measurements to quantitatively inform future designs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据