4.6 Article

Integrative genomics of gene and metabolic regulation by estrogen receptors α and β, and their coregulators

期刊

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/msb.2013.28

关键词

coregulator usage; estrogen receptors alpha and beta; gene regulation; metabolism; proliferation

资金

  1. NIH from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) [P50 AT006268]
  2. Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS)
  3. National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  4. NIH [R37DK015556, T32 ES07326]
  5. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  6. Singapore Agency for Science, Technology and Research
  7. A*STAR of Singapore
  8. EU [FP6-018652]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The closely related transcription factors (TFs), estrogen receptors ER alpha and ER beta, regulate divergent gene expression programs and proliferative outcomes in breast cancer. Utilizing breast cancer cells with ER alpha, ER beta, or both receptors as a model system to define the basis for differing response specification by related TFs, we show that these TFs and their key coregulators, SRC3 and RIP140, generate overlapping as well as unique chromatin-binding and transcription-regulating modules. Cistrome and transcriptome analyses and the use of clustering algorithms delineated 11 clusters representing different chromatin-bound receptor and coregulator assemblies that could be functionally associated through enrichment analysis with distinct patterns of gene regulation and preferential coregulator usage, RIP140 with ER beta and SRC3 with ER alpha. The receptors modified each other's transcriptional effect, and ER beta countered the proliferative drive of ER alpha through several novel mechanisms associated with specific binding-site clusters. Our findings delineate distinct TF-coregulator assemblies that function as control nodes, specifying precise patterns of gene regulation, proliferation, and metabolism, as exemplified by two of the most important nuclear hormone receptors in human breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据