4.6 Article

Functional modularity of nuclear hormone receptors in a Caenorhabditis elegans metabolic gene regulatory network

期刊

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/msb.2010.23

关键词

C. elegans; gene regulatory network; metabolism; nuclear hormone receptor; transcription factor

资金

  1. NIH [DK068429, DK071713, CA020535]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [5 P30 DK32520]
  3. UMass DERC [DK32520]
  4. American Heart Association
  5. American Federation for Aging Research
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA020535, R37CA020535] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK068429, R21DK071713, P30DK032520] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) provide insights into the mechanisms of differential gene expression at a systems level. GRNs that relate to metazoan development have been studied extensively. However, little is still known about the design principles, organization and functionality of GRNs that control physiological processes such as metabolism, homeostasis and responses to environmental cues. In this study, we report the first experimentally mapped metazoan GRN of Caenorhabditis elegans metabolic genes. This network is enriched for nuclear hormone receptors (NHRs). The NHR family has greatly expanded in nematodes: humans have 48 NHRs, but C. elegans has 284, most of which are uncharacterized. We find that the C. elegans metabolic GRN is highly modular and that two GRN modules predominantly consist of NHRs. Network modularity has been proposed to facilitate a rapid response to different cues. As NHRs are metabolic sensors that are poised to respond to ligands, this suggests that C. elegans GRNs evolved to enable rapid and adaptive responses to different cues by a concurrence of NHR family expansion and modular GRN wiring. Molecular Systems Biology 6: 367; published online 11 May 2010; doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.23

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据