4.6 Article

Engineering the Salmonella type III secretion system to export spider silk monomers

期刊

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/msb.2009.62

关键词

automated DNA synthesis; cellular engineering; biomaterials; genetic parts; systems biology

资金

  1. Genentech-Sandler Graduate Fellowship
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  3. National Defence Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship
  4. Pew Fellowship
  5. Office of Naval Research, Packard Fellowship
  6. NIH [EY016546, AI067699]
  7. NSF [BES-0547637]
  8. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [PN1EY016546, PN2EY016546] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI067699] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The type III secretion system (T3SS) exports proteins from the cytoplasm, through both the inner and outer membranes, to the external environment. Here, a system is constructed to harness the T3SS encoded within Salmonella Pathogeneity Island 1 to export proteins of biotechnological interest. The system is composed of an operon containing the target protein fused to an N-terminal secretion tag and its cognate chaperone. Transcription is controlled by a genetic circuit that only turns on when the cell is actively secreting protein. The system is refined using a small human protein (DH domain) and demonstrated by exporting three silk monomers (ADF-1, -2, and -3), representative of different types of spider silk. Synthetic genes encoding silk monomers were designed to enhance genetic stability and codon usage, constructed by automated DNA synthesis, and cloned into the secretion control system. Secretion rates up to 1.8 mg l(-1) h(-1) are demonstrated with up to 14% of expressed protein secreted. This work introduces new parts to control protein secretion in Gram-negative bacteria, which will be broadly applicable to problems in biotechnology. Molecular Systems Biology 5: 309; published online 15 September 2009; doi:10.1038/msb.2009.62

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据