4.3 Article

Immunocontraceptive Potential of the Ig-Like Domain of Izumo

期刊

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 76, 期 8, 页码 794-801

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.21027

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30470909, 30640031]
  2. Deng Shan Project of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology [06JC14046]
  3. 973 Basic Research Funding Scheme of China [6199905501]
  4. Science Research Project of Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai [06ZR14057]
  5. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (Shanghai) [S30201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate whether the Ig-like domain of sperm protein Izumo or the other part of the protein could be used as an immunocontraceptive antigen, three partially overlapping cDNA fragments (PA, PB, and PC), together covering entire mouse Izumo, were cloned, expressed, and purified. PB contains the whole Ig-like domain of mouse Izumo. The anti-PB antibody significantly inhibited the fusion of sperm with zona-free mouse eggs with no effect on sperm motility, while anti-PA and anti-PC antibodies virtually had no effect on sperm-egg fusion at the same concentration. Furthermore, in the presence of anti-PB antibody, the anti-sperm reactivity could be competitively inhibited by recombinant PB protein. The PB-specific antibody staining was restricted to the acrosome region in acrosome-reacted mouse spermatozoa by indirect immunofluorescence. Active immunization with the PB antigen sharply raised the antibody titers in mouse that were enough to cause a significant reduction in fertility compared to the PA and PC immunized groups. In conclusion, our data indicate that the Ig-like domain of Izumo plays an important role in the fertilization process, as verified by the dose-dependent reduction in fertilization rates in mouse IVF trials and mouse mating assay. These results indicate that the Ig-like domain of Izumo might be a new candidate for the development of a contraceptive vaccine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据