4.3 Article

Global gene expression analysis of bovine blastocysts produced by multiple methods

期刊

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 75, 期 5, 页码 744-758

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20797

关键词

somatic cell nuclear transfer; bovine blastocysts; gene expression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reproductive efficiency using somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) technology remains suboptimal. Of the various efforts to improve the efficiency, chromatin transfer (CT) and clone-clone aggregation (NTagg) have been reported to produce live cloned animals. To better understand the molecular mechanisms of somatic cell reprogramming during SCNT and assess the various SCNT methods on the molecular level, we performed gene expression analysis on bovine blastocysts produced via standard nuclear transfer (NT), CT, NTagg, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and artificial insemination (Al), as well as on somatic donor cells, using bovine genome arrays. The expression profiles of SCNT (NT, CT, NTagg) embryos were compared with IVF and Al embryos as well as donor cells. NT and CT embryos have indistinguishable gene expression patterns. In comparison to IVF or Al embryos, the number of differentially expressed genes in NTagg embryos is significantly higher than in NT and CT embryos. Genes that were differentially expressed between all the SCNT embryos and IVF or Al embryos are identified. Compared to Al embryos, more than half of the genes found deregulated between SCNT and Al embryos appear to be the result of in vitro culture alone. The results indicate that although SCNT methods have altered differentiated somatic nuclei gene expression to more closely resemble that of embryonic nuclei, combination of insufficient reprogramming and in vitro culture condition compromise the developmental potential of SCNT embryos. This is the first set of comprehensive data for analyzing the molecular impact of various nuclear transfer methods on bovine pre-implantation embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 75: 744-758, 2008. (C) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据