4.8 Article

Medial prefrontal cortex pathology in schizophrenia as revealed by convergent findings from multimodal imaging

期刊

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 823-830

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2009.146

关键词

schizophrenia; voxel-based morphometry; fMRI; diffusion tensor imaging; default mode network; anterior cingulate cortex

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigacion en Red de Salud Mental, CIBERSAM
  2. Marie Curie European Reintegration Grant [MERG-CT-2004-511069]
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CP04/00322, PI05/2693]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroimaging studies have found evidence of altered brain structure and function in schizophrenia, but have had complex findings regarding the localization of abnormality. We applied multimodal imaging (voxel-based morphometry (VBM), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) combined with tractography) to 32 chronic schizophrenic patients and matched healthy controls. At a conservative threshold of P = 0.01 corrected, structural and functional imaging revealed overlapping regions of abnormality in the medial frontal cortex. DTI found that white matter abnormality predominated in the anterior corpus callosum, and analysis of the anatomical connectivity of representative seed regions again implicated fibres projecting to the medial frontal cortex. There was also evidence of convergent abnormality in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, although here the laterality was less consistent across techniques. The medial frontal region identified by these three imaging techniques corresponds to the anterior midline node of the default mode network, a brain system which is believed to support internally directed thought, a state of watchfulness, and/or the maintenance of one's sense of self, and which is of considerable current interest in neuropsychiatric disorders. Molecular Psychiatry (2010) 15, 823-830; doi: 10.1038/mp.2009.146; published online 12 January 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据