4.8 Article

Strong genetic evidence for a selective influence of GABAA receptors on a component of the bipolar disorder phenotype

期刊

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 146-153

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2008.66

关键词

bipolar disorder; schizoaffective disorder; GABA(A) receptors; genetics; nosology

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. MRC [G0801418, G0000934] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0000934, G0801418, G9817803B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite compelling evidence for a major genetic contribution to risk of bipolar mood disorder, conclusive evidence implicating specific genes or pathophysiological systems has proved elusive. In part this is likely to be related to the unknown validity of current phenotype definitions and consequent aetiological heterogeneity of samples. In the recent Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium genome-wide association analysis of bipolar disorder (1868 cases, 2938 controls) one of the most strongly associated polymorphisms lay within the gene encoding the GABA(A) receptor beta 1 subunit, GABRB1. Aiming to increase biological homogeneity, we sought the diagnostic subset that showed the strongest signal at this polymorphism and used this to test for independent evidence of association with other members of the GABA(A) receptor gene family. The index signal was significantly enriched in the 279 cases meeting Research Diagnostic Criteria for schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (P=3.8 x 10(-6)). Independently, these cases showed strong evidence that variation in GABA(A) receptor genes influences risk for this phenotype (independent system-wide P=6.6 x 10(-5)) with association signals also at GABRA4, GABRB3, GABRA5 and GABRR1. Our findings have the potential to inform understanding of presentation, pathogenesis and nosology of bipolar disorders. Our method of phenotype refinement may be useful in studies of other complex psychiatric and non-psychiatric disorders. Molecular Psychiatry (2010) 15, 146-153; doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.66; published online 1 July 2008

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据