4.5 Article

Cytokinins Act Synergistically with Salicylic Acid to Activate Defense Gene Expression in Rice

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 287-296

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-06-12-0152-R

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [22570057]
  2. Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries [GMA0001, PMI0008]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22570057] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hormone crosstalk is pivotal in plant pathogen interactions. Here, we report on the accumulation of cytokinins (CK) in rice seedlings after infection of blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae and its potential significance in rice-M. oryzae interaction. Blast infection to rice seedlings increased levels of N-6-(Delta(2)-isopentenyl) adenine (iP), iP riboside (iPR), and iPR 5'-phosphates (iPRP) in leaf blades. Consistent with this, CK signaling was activated around the infection sites, as shown by histochemical staining for beta-glucuronidase activity driven by a CK-responsive OsRR6 promoter. Diverse CK species were also detected in the hyphae (mycelium), conidia, and culture filtrates of blast fungus, indicating that M. oryzae is capable of production as well as hyphal secretion of CK. Co-treatment of leaf blades with CK and salicylic acid (SA), but not with either one alone, markedly induced pathogenesis-related genes OsPR1b and probenazole-induced protein 1 (PBZ1). These effects were diminished by RNAi-knockdown of OsNPR1 or WRKY45, the key regulators of the SA signaling pathway in rice, indicating that the effects of CK depend on these two regulators. Taken together, our data imply a coevolutionary rice M. oryzae interaction, wherein M. oryzae probably elevates rice CK levels for its own benefits such as nutrient translocation. Rice plants, on the other hand, sense it as an infection signal and activate defense reactions through the synergistic action with SA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据