4.5 Article

Nitric Oxide-Mediated Stress Imprint in Potato as an Effect of Exposure to a Priming Agent

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 1469-1477

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-02-12-0044-R

关键词

-

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N N303 340735]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated how potato exposed to a chemical agent could activate nitric oxide (NO)-dependent events facilitating more potent defense responses to a subsequent pathogen attack. Obtained data revealed that all applied inducers, i.e., beta-aminobutyric acid (BABA), gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), laminarin, or 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA), were active stimuli in potentiating NO synthesis in the primed potato. It is assumed, for the mechanism proposed in this paper, that priming involves reversible S-nitrosylated protein (S-nitrosothiols [SNO]) storage as one of the short-term stress imprint components, apart from epigenetic changes sensitized by NO. Based on BABA- and GABA-induced events, it should be stated that a rise in NO generation and coding the NO message in SNO storage at a relatively low threshold together with histone H2B up-regulation might create short-term imprint activation, facilitating acquisition of a competence to react faster after challenge inoculation. Laminarin elicited strong NO upregulation with an enhanced SNO pool-altered biochemical imprint in the form of less effective local recall, nevertheless being fully protective in distal responses against P. infestans. In turn, INA showed the most intensified NO generation and abundant formation of SNO, both after the inducer treatment and challenge inoculation abolishing potato resistance against the pathogen. Our results indicate, for the first time, that a precise control of synthesized NO in cooperation with reversible SNO storage and epigenetic modifications might play an important role in integrating and coordinating defense potato responses in the priming phenomenon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据