4.5 Article

Methods to Study PAMP-Triggered Immunity Using Tomato and Nicotiana benthamiana

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 991-999

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-23-8-0991

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [IOB-0841807, DBI-0605059]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2010-65108-20503]
  3. USDA [IS-4159-08C]
  4. NIFA [2010-65108-20503, 581164] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the molecular basis of plant responses to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) is an active area of research in the field of plant microbe interactions. A growing number of plant genes involved in various steps of PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) pathways and microbial factors involved in the elicitation or suppression of PTI have been identified. These studies have largely relied on Arabidopsis thaliana and, therefore, most of the PTI assays have been developed and optimized for that model plant system. Although PTI is a conserved feature among plants, the response spectra vary across different species. Thus, there is a need for robust PTI assays in other pathosystems, such as those involving Solanaceae plant pathogen interactions, which include many economically important plants and their diseases. We have optimized molecular, cellular, and whole-plant methods to measure PTI responses in two widely studied solanaceous species, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and Nicotiana benthamiana. Here, we provide detailed protocols for measuring various PTI-associated phenotypes, including bacterial populations after pretreatment of leaves with PAMPs, induction of reporter genes, callose deposition, activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases, and a luciferase-based reporter system. These methods will facilitate limited genetic screens and detailed characterization of potential PTI-related genes in model and economically important Solanaceae spp.-pathogen interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据