4.5 Article

AY-WB Phytoplasma Secretes a Protein That Targets Plant Cell Nuclei

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 18-30

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-22-1-0018

关键词

insect vector; leafhopper; mollicute; sec-dependent secretion; virulence protein

资金

  1. OSU-OARDC Research Enhancement Competitive Grant [2001-052]
  2. Marie Curie International Reintegration Grant [MIRG-14-CT-2007-046570]
  3. OSU- OARDC Research Enhancement Competitive Grant [2003-170]
  4. Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/J/000C0623] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BBS/E/J/000C0623] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fully sequenced genome of aster yellows phytoplasma strain witches' broom (AY-WB; Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris) was mined for the presence of genes encoding secreted proteins based on the presence of N-terminal signal peptides (SP). We identified 56 secreted AY-WB proteins (SAP). These SAP are candidate effector proteins potentially involved in interaction with plant and insect cell components. One of these SAP, SAP11, contains an N-terminal SP sequence and a eukaryotic bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS). Transcripts for SAP11 were detected in AY-WB-infected plants. Yellow fluorescence protein (YFP)-tagged SAP11 accumulated in Nicotiana benthamiana cell nuclei, whereas the nuclear targeting of YFP-tagged SAP11 mutants with disrupted NLS was inhibited. The nuclear transport of YFP-SAP11 was also inhibited in N. benthamiana plants in which the expression of importin alpha was knocked down using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). Furthermore, SAP11 was detected by immunocytology in nuclei of young sink tissues of China aster plants infected with AY-WB. In summary, this work shows that AY-WB phytoplasma produces a protein that targets the nuclei of plant host cells; this protein is a potential phytoplasma effector that may alter plant cell physiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据