4.7 Article

Interaction of a Blumeria graminis f. sp hordei effector candidate with a barley ARF-GAP suggests that host vesicle trafficking is a fungal pathogenicity target

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 535-549

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12110

关键词

ARF-GAP; Blumeria graminis f. sp hordei; effector; Erysiphe pisi; Golovinomyces orontii; powdery mildew; vesicle trafficking

资金

  1. Max-Planck Society
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  3. International Max-Planck Research School (IMPRS)
  4. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Filamentous phytopathogens, such as fungi and oomycetes, secrete effector proteins to establish successful interactions with their plant hosts. In contrast with oomycetes, little is known about effector functions in true fungi. We used a bioinformatics pipeline to identify Blumeria effector candidates (BECs) from the obligate biotrophic barley powdery mildew pathogen, Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh). BEC1-BEC5 are expressed at different time points during barley infection. BEC1, BEC2 and BEC4 have orthologues in the Arabidopsis thaliana-infecting powdery mildew fungus Golovinomyces orontii. Arabidopsis lines stably expressing the G. orontii BEC2 orthologue, GoEC2, are more susceptible to infection with the non-adapted fungus Erysiphe pisi, suggesting that GoEC2 contributes to powdery mildew virulence. For BEC3 and BEC4, we identified thiopurine methyltransferase, a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and an ADP ribosylation factor-GTPase-activating protein (ARF-GAP) as potential host targets. Arabidopsis knockout lines of the respective HvARF-GAP orthologue (AtAGD5) allowed higher entry levels of E. pisi, but exhibited elevated resistance to the oomycete Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis. We hypothesize that ARF-GAP proteins are conserved targets of powdery and downy mildew effectors, and we speculate that BEC4 might interfere with defence-associated host vesicle trafficking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据