4.7 Article

The broad bacterial blight resistance of rice line CBB23 is triggered by a novel transcription activator-like (TAL) effector of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 333-341

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12092

关键词

Xa23; TAL effector; broad-spectrum resistance; Xoo; avrXa23; rice

资金

  1. National High-Technology Research Program (The '863' Program) of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006AA10Z106]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171812]
  3. US National Science Foundation [1238189]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1238189] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial blight (BB), caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), is not only a disease devastating rice production worldwide, but also an ideal model system for the study of the interaction between plants and their bacterial pathogens. The rice near-isogenic line (NIL) CBB23, derived from a cross between a wild rice Oryza rufipogon accession (RBB16) and a susceptible indica rice variety (Jingang 30), is highly resistant to all field Xoo strains tested so far. Although the BB resistance of CBB23 has been widely used in rice breeding programmes, the mechanism of its extremely broad-spectrum resistance remains unknown. Here, we report the molecular cloning of an avirulence gene, designated as avrXa23, from Xoo strain PXO99(A). We validate that AvrXa23, a novel transcription activator-like effector, specifically triggers the broad-spectrum BB resistance in CBB23. The prevalence of avrXa23 in all 38 Xoo strains surveyed may explain the broad-spectrum feature of BB resistance in CBB23. The results will significantly facilitate the molecular cloning of the corresponding resistance (R) gene in the host, and provide new insights into our understanding of the molecular mechanism for broad-spectrum disease resistance in plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据