4.7 Article

Ancient diversity of splicing motifs and protein surfaces in the wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides) LR10 coiled coil (CC) and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 276-287

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00744.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [CT-2005-513949]
  2. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [205/08, 1478/04, 1719/08]
  3. binational agricaltural research and devlopment fund (BARD) [US4323-10C]
  4. Consiliul National al Cercetarii Stiintifice din Invatamantul Superior (CNCSIS) [PN-II-ID-PCE 249, 168/2007, POSDRU/89/1.5/S/60746]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we explore the diversity and its distribution along the wheat leaf rust resistance protein LR10 three-dimensional structure. Lr10 is a leaf rust resistance gene encoding a coiled coilnucleotide-binding siteleucine-rich repeat (CCNBSLRR) class of protein. Lr10 was cloned and sequenced from 58 accessions representing diverse habitats of wild emmer wheat in Israel. Nucleotide diversity was very high relative to other wild emmer wheat genes (p= 0.029). The CC domain was found to be the most diverse domain and subject to positive selection. Superimposition of the diversity on the CC three-dimensional structure showed that some of the variable and positively selected residues were solvent exposed and may interact with other proteins. The LRR domain was relatively conserved, but showed a hotspot of amino acid variation between two haplotypes in the ninth repeat. This repeat was longer than the other LRRs, and three-dimensional modelling suggested that an extensive a helix structure was formed in this region. The two haplotypes also differed in splicing regulation motifs. In genotypes with one haplotype, an intron was alternatively spliced in this region, whereas, in genotypes with the other haplotype, this intron did not splice at all. The two haplotypes are proposed to be ancient and maintained by balancing selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据