4.7 Article

Salicylic Acid Signaling Controls the Maturation and Localization of the Arabidopsis Defense Protein ACCELERATED CELL DEATH6

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 1365-1383

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mp/ssu072

关键词

ACD6; protein trafficking; protein quality control; salicylic acid

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM54292]
  2. National Science Foundation [IOS 0822393]
  3. JSPS
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [0822393] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0822393] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ACCELERATED CELL DEATH6 (ACD6) is a multipass membrane protein with an ankyrin domain that acts in a positive feedback loop with the defense signal salicylic acid (SA). This study implemented biochemical approaches to infer changes in ACD6 complexes and localization. In addition to forming endoplasmic reticulum (ER)- and plasma membrane (PM)-localized complexes, ACD6 forms soluble complexes, where it is bound to cytosolic HSP70, ubiquitinated, and degraded via the proteasome. Thus, ACD6 constitutively undergoes ER-associated degradation. During SA signaling, the soluble ACD6 pool decreases, whereas the PM pool increases. Similarly, ACD6-1, an activated version of ACD6 that induces SA, is present at low levels in the soluble fraction and high levels in the PM. However, ACD6 variants with amino acid substitutions in the ankyrin domain form aberrant, inactive complexes, are induced by a SA agonist, but show no PM localization. SA signaling also increases the PM pools of FLAGELLIN SENSING2 (FLS2) and BRI1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE 1 (BAK1). FLS2 forms complexes ACD6; both FLS2 and BAK1 require ACD6 for maximal accumulation at the PM in response to SA signaling. A plausible scenario is that SA increases the efficiency of productive folding and/or complex formation in the ER, such that ACD6, together with FLS2 and BAK1, reaches the cell surface to more effectively promote immune responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据