4.7 Review

Activation of defense response pathways by OGs and Flg22 elicitors in Arabidopsis seedlings

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT
卷 1, 期 3, 页码 423-445

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mp/ssn019

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DBI-0114783]
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM48707]
  3. European Union [23044]
  4. Ministero dell Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR)
  5. Fondo per gli Investimenti della Ricerca di Base 2001 and Cofinanziamento 2002
  6. Giovanni Armenise-Harvard Foundation
  7. Institute Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We carried out transcriptional profiling analysis in 10-d-old Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings treated with oligogalacturonides (OGs), oligosaccharides derived from the plant cell wall, or the bacterial flagellin peptide Flg22, general elicitors of the basal defense response in plants. Although detected by different receptors, both OGs and Flg22 trigger a fast and transient response that is both similar and comprehensive, and characterized by activation of early stages of multiple defense signaling pathways, particularly JA-associated processes. However, the response to Flg22 is stronger in both the number of genes differentially expressed and the amplitude of change. The magnitude of induction of individual genes is in both cases dose-dependent, but, even at very high concentrations, OGs do not induce a response that is as comprehensive as that seen with Flg22. While high doses of either microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP) elicit a late response that includes activation of senescence processes, SA-dependent secretory pathway genes and PR1 expression are substantially induced only by Flg22. These results suggest a lower threshold for activation of early responses than for sustained or SA-mediated late defenses. Expression patterns of amino-cyclopropane-carboxylate synthase genes also implicate ethylene biosynthesis in regulation of the late innate immune response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据