4.4 Article

Strong geometric-phase effects in the hydrogen-exchange reaction at high collision energies: II. Quasiclassical trajectory analysis

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYSICS
卷 108, 期 7-9, 页码 969-980

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00268971003610218

关键词

hydrogen-exchange reaction; geometric phase; quasiclassical trajectories; topology and homotopy; nearside-farside analysis

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. EPSRC [EP/E008879/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E008879/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent calculations on the hydrogen-exchange reaction [Bouakline et al., J. Chem. Phys. 128, 124322 (2008)], have found strong geometric phase (GP) effects in the state-to-state differential cross-sections (DCS), at energies above the energetic minimum of the conical intersection (CI) seam, which cancel out in the integral cross-sections (ICS). In this article, we explain the origin of this cancellation and make other predictions about the nature of the reaction mechanisms at these high energies by carrying out quasiclassical trajectory (QCT) calculations. Detailed comparisons are made with the quantum results by splitting the quantum and the QCT cross-sections into contributions from reaction paths that wind in different senses around the CI and that scatter the products in the nearside and farside directions. Reaction paths that traverse one transition state (1-TS) scatter their products in just the nearside direction, whereas paths that traverse two transition states (2-TS) scatter in both the nearside and farside directions. However, the nearside 2-TS products scatter into a different region of angular phase-space than the 1-TS products, which explains why the GP effects cancel out in the ICS. Analysis of the QCT results also suggests that two separate reaction mechanisms may be responsible for the 2-TS scattering at high energies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据