4.4 Article

Velocity map imaging studies of the photodissociation of H2O+ cations

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYSICS
卷 108, 期 7-9, 页码 945-955

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00268971003596177

关键词

molecular photodissociation; gas phase; H2O+ cations; ion imaging

资金

  1. EPSRC
  2. EU
  3. Marie Curie Initial Training Network (ICONIC) [238671]
  4. [EP/G00224X]
  5. EPSRC [EP/G00224X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G00224X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The near-threshold photofragmentation dynamics of state-selected H2O+ cations have been investigated using velocity map ion imaging methods. The cations were prepared in the v = 0 level of the ground ((X) over tilde B-2(1)) electronic state, by 2 + 1 resonance enhanced multiphoton ionization via selected rotational levels of the H2O, (C) over tilde B-1(1), v = 0 state. Subsequent two photon excitation of the resulting H2O+ cations to (B) over tilde B-2(2) state levels lying above the lowest dissociation limit (i.e. at total energies in the range 46000-50600 cm(-1)) results in O-H bond fission and OH+ fragment ion formation. These fragments display isotropic recoil velocity distributions, which peak at low kinetic energy but extend to the highest speeds allowed by energy conservation. Ab initio calculations of key sections through the potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the ground and first few excited states of H2O+ suggest two possible mechanisms for the observed rotational and (when energetically allowed) vibrational excitation of the OH+ fragments. Both require initial non-adiabatic (vibronic coupling) from the photo-prepared (B) over tilde state level to high levels of the (A) over tilde (2)A(1) state, but involve different subsequent HO+-H bond fission mechanisms. One involves Renner-Teller coupling to the ground state PES, while the alternative requires spin-orbit induced coupling to the repulsive (a) over tilde B-4(1)((4)A '') state PES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据