4.4 Article

Assessment of basis sets for F12 explicitly-correlated molecular electronic-structure methods

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYSICS
卷 107, 期 8-12, 页码 963-975

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00268970802708942

关键词

basis sets; explicitly-correlated wave functions; F12 methods; atomisation energies

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SPP 1145, KL 721/2-3]
  2. DFG [TE 644/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One-electron basis sets for F12 explicitly-correlated molecular electronic-structure methods are assessed by analysing the accuracy of Hartree-Fock energies and valence-only second-order correlation energies of a test set of 106 small molecules containing the atoms H, C, N, O and F. For these molecules, near Hartree-Fock-limit energies and benchmark second-order correlation energies (accurate to within 99.95% of the basis-set limit) are provided. Absolute energies are analysed as well as the Hartree-Fock and second-order correlation contributions to the atomisation energies of the molecules. Standard basis sets such as the Karlsruhe def2-TZVPP and def2-QZVPP sets and the augmented correlation-consistent polarised valence X-tuple zeta (aug-cc-p VXZ, X = D, T, Q, 5) sets are compared with the specialised cc-pVXZ-F12 (X D, T, Q) sets that were recently optimised by Peterson and co-workers [J. Chem. Phys. 128, 084102 (2008)] for use in F12 theory. The results obtained from F12 explicitly-correlated molecular electronic-structure calculations are compared with those that are obtained by standard electronic-structure calculations followed by basis-set extrapolation based on the X (3) convergence behaviour of the aug-cc-pVXZ basis sets. The most important conclusions are that the cc-pVXZ-F12 sets are the preferred basis sets for F12 theory and that the X-3 extrapolation from the aug-cc-pVQZ and aug-cc-pV5Z is slightly more accurate than F12 theory in the cc-pVTZ-F12 basis but less accurate than F12 theory in the cc-pVQZ-F12 basis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据