4.7 Article

Diversification and reticulation in the circumboreal fern genus Cryptogramma

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 589-599

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.02.020

关键词

Cryptogramma; Pteridaceae; gapCp; Introgression; Polyploidy; Coniogramme

资金

  1. UAF Center for Global Change Student Research Grant
  2. UAF Center for Global Change
  3. Alaska EPSCoR Landscape Genetics Student Research Award
  4. Alaska Quaternary Center Hopkins Fellowship
  5. American Society of Plant Taxonomists Graduate Student Research Award
  6. University of Alaska Ted McHenry Biology Field Research Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the evolutionary complexity that resulted from cryptic diversification and polyploidy in parsley ferns (Cryptogramma). A total of 14 species were included in our data set, with six outgroup species and eight Cryptogramma species. DNA sequence data from six plastid loci (rbcL, rbcL-accD, rbcL-atpB, rps4-trnS, trnG-trnR and trnP-petG) were analyzed using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods to provide the first rigorous assessment of diversification in the genus, including testing the monophyly of the genus and sections. Cryptogramma and Coniogramme are recovered as reciprocally monophyletic sister genera. We established the monophyly of both sections within Cryptogramma. Furthermore, our sequence data reveal that described species reflect mostly allopatric reciprocally monophyletic lineages that are independent evolutionary trajectories. Using sequence data from the nuclear locus (gapCp) we find that the European C crispa is an autotetraploid with a partially diploidized genome, while the North American tetraploid Cryptogramma sitchensis is an allopolyploid derived from C. acrostichoides and C. raddeana. Subsequent backcrossing between C. sitchensis and C acrostichoides has allowed the introgression of C raddeana alleles into northern populations of C acrostichoides. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据