4.4 Article

Environmental drivers of aquatic macrophyte communities in southern tropical African rivers: Zambia as a case study

期刊

AQUATIC BOTANY
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 19-28

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2015.03.002

关键词

River plants; Africa; Macrophyte diversity; Tropical river ecology

资金

  1. European Commission/African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (EC/ACP) Science & Technology Programme [AFS/2009/219013]
  2. UK Department for International Development (DfID) DelPHE Programme
  3. Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland
  4. Royal Geographical Society
  5. Royal Scottish Geographical Society
  6. South of Scotland Youth Awards Trust
  7. Gilchrist Trust
  8. Courts of the University of Glasgow
  9. Courts of the University of Aberdeen
  10. UK Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) Darwin Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first-ever extensive macrophyte survey of Zambian rivers and associated floodplain waterbodies, conducted during 2006-2012, collected 271 samples from 228 sites, mainly located in five freshwater ecoregions of the world primarily represented in Zambia. The results supported the hypothesis that variation in macrophyte community structure (measured as species composition and diversity) in southern tropical African river systems, using Zambia as a case study area, is driven primarily by geographical variation in water physico-chemical conditions. In total, 335 macrophyte taxa were recorded, and a chronological cumulative species records curve for the dataset showed no sign of asymptoting: clearly many additional macrophyte species remain to be found in Zambian rivers. Emergent macrophytes were predominant (236 taxa), together with 26 floating and 73 submerged taxa. Several species were rare in a regional or international context, including two IUCN Red Data List species: Aponogeton rehmanii and Nymphaea divaricata. Ordination and classification analysis of the data found little evidence for temporal change in vegetation, at repeatedly-sampled sites, but strong evidence for the existence of seven groups of samples from geographically-varied study sites. These supported differing sets of vegetation (with eight species assemblages present in the sample-groups) and showed substantial inter-group differences in both macrophyte alpha-diversity, and geographically-varying physico-chemical parameters. The evidence suggested that the main environmental drivers of macrophyte community composition and diversity were altitude, stream order, shade, pH, alkalinity, NO3-N, and underwater light availability, while PO4-P showed slightly lower, but still significant variation between sample-groups. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据