4.7 Review

Analytical methods for determination of sugars and sweetness of horticultural products-A review

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 179-192

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.01.001

关键词

Fruit and vegetables; Sweetness; Non-structural carbohydrates; Near infrared spectroscopy; Hyperspectral imaging; Electronic tongue

资金

  1. Postharvest Innovation Fund of the Department of Science and Technology [2/2014]
  2. Citrus Research International
  3. National Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The determination and quantification of sugars is important for quality control and assurance of horticultural produce. This review discusses analytical methods for determination of sugars and sweetness of fresh and processed fruit and vegetables, including the use of destructive and non-destructive instrumental techniques to evaluate sugar composition and characterize taste profile or sweetness. From the standard hand-held refractometer to the hydrometer, electronic tongue and high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with different detectors, a wide range of devices have been used to determine sugar composition and sweetness of many fruit and vegetable products. Although chromatographic techniques are very accurate and useful, they require extensive sample preparation based on solvent extraction and hence are generally time-consuming and expensive. Visible to near infrared spectroscopy (vis/NIRS) has been proposed as an interesting alternative to traditional methods due to its rapidity, simplicity, cost effectiveness and potential for routine analysis if proper calibration and validation steps were developed. Current trends favour analytical methods that are simple to use, quick and non-destructive. The prospects for using emerging technologies such as hyperspectral imaging and nuclear magnetic resonance for non-destructive assessment of sugar content and sweetness of fresh and processed horticultural food products are also discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据