4.5 Article

H2 Relaxin Is a Biased Ligand Relative to H3 Relaxin at the Relaxin Family Peptide Receptor 3 (RXFP3)

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 77, 期 5, 页码 759-772

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.109.061432

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [436713, 454375, 519461]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Relaxin family peptide 3 receptors (RXFP3) are activated by H3-relaxin to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation and stimulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 phosphorylation. In this study, we sought to identify novel signaling pathways coupled to RXFP3 and to investigate whether other members of the relaxin peptide family activated these pathways. Two patterns of signaling were observed in RXFP3-expressing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 and human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells (CHO-RXFP3 and HEK-RXFP3) and murine septal neuron SN56 cell lines: 1) strong inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation, ERK1/2 activation and nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B reporter gene activation in cells stimulated with H3 relaxin, with weaker activity observed for H2 relaxin, porcine relaxin, or insulin-like peptide (INSL) 3 and 2) strong stimulation of activator protein (AP)-1 reporter genes by H2 relaxin, with weaker activation observed with H3 or porcine relaxin. Two distinct ligand binding sites were identified on RXFP3-expressing cells using two different radioligands. I-125-INSL5 A-chain/relaxin-3 B-chain chimera bound with high affinity to the RXFP3-expressing cells with competition by H3 relaxin or a H3 relaxin B-chain dimeric peptide, consistent with previous reports. Binding studies with I-125-H2 relaxin revealed a distinct binding site with potent competition observed with H2 relaxin, H3 relaxin, or INSL3 and weaker competition with porcine relaxin. Thus H3 relaxin potently activates all signaling pathways coupled to RXFP3, whereas H2 relaxin is an AP-1-biased ligand relative to H3 relaxin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据