4.5 Article

A Novel Tumor-Targeted Therapy Using a Claudin-4-Targeting Molecule

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 918-926

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.109.058412

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Suzuken Memorial Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carcinogenesis is often accompanied by dysfunctional tight junction (TJs), resulting in the loss of cellular polarity. Claudin, a tetra-transmembrane protein, plays a pivotal role in the barrier and fence functions of TJs. Claudin-4 is deregulated in various cancers, including breast, prostate, ovarian, and gastric cancer. Claudin-4 may be a promising target molecule for tumor therapy, but the claudin-targeting strategy has never been fully developed. In the present study, we prepared a claudin-4-targeting molecule by fusion of the C-terminal fragment of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (C-CPE) with the protein synthesis inhibitory factor (PSIF) derived from Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin. PSIF was not cytotoxic to claudin-4-expressing cells, whereas C-CPE-PSIF was cytotoxic. Cells that express claudin-1, -2, and -5 were less sensitive to C-CPE-PSIF. Pretreatment of the cells with C-CPE attenuated C-CPE-PSIF- induced cytotoxicity, and mutation of C-CPE in the claudin-4-binding residues attenuated the cytotoxicity of C-CPE-PSIF. TJ-undeveloped cells were more sensitive to C-CPE-PSIF than TJ-developed cells. It is noteworthy that polarized epithelial cells are sensitive to C-CPE-PSIF applied to the basal side, whereas the cells were less sensitive to C-CPE-PSIF applied to the apical side. Intratumoral injection of C-CPE-PSIF reduced tumor growth. This is the first report to indicate that a claudin-4-targeting strategy may be a promising method to overcome the malignant tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据