4.7 Article

Disulfide Cross-Linked Phosphorylcholine Micelles for Triggered Release of Camptothecin

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 2684-2692

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp400114n

关键词

polymer-drug conjugate; polymer prodrug; poly(methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine); cancer drugs; camptothecin; drug delivery; polymer micelle

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [S121000000211]
  2. NSF MRSEC Research Experience for Undergraduate (REU) Program at UMass
  3. National Institutes of Health [R21CA167674]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of block copolymers based on 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) were synthesized by reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. Incorporation of dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA) into the hydrophobic block led to formation of block copolymer micelles in water. The micelles were between 15 and 30 nm in diameter, as characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS), with some size control achieved by adjusting the hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance. Cross-linked micelles were prepared by disulfide formation, and observed to be stable in solution for weeks. The micelles proved amenable to disassembly when treated with a reducing agent, such as dithiothreitol (DTT), and represent a potential delivery platform for chemotherapeutic agents. As a proof-of-concept, camptothecin (CPT) was conjugated to the polymer scaffold through a disulfide linkage, and release of the drug from the micelle was monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy. These CPT-loaded prodrug micelles showed a reduction in release rate compared to physically encapsulated CPT. The use of disulfide conjugation facilitated drug release under reducing conditions, with a half-life (t(1/2)) of 5.5 h in the presence of 3 mM DTT, compared to 28 h in PBS. The toxicity of the micellar prodrugs was evaluated in cell culture against human breast (MCF7) and colorectal (COLO205) cancer cell lines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据