4.7 Article

Potential Use of Lactosylated Dendrimer (G3)/α-Cyclodextrin Conjugates as Hepatocyte-Specific siRNA Carriers for the Treatment of Familial Amyloidotic Polyneuropathy

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 1645-1653

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp200654g

关键词

dendrimer; cyclodextrin; siRNA; familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy; hepatocyte-specific delivery

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16590114, 18590144, 20590037]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18590144, 20590037, 23659303, 16590114] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To reveal the potential use of lactosylated-dendrimer (G3) conjugates with alpha-cyclodextrin (Lac-alpha-CDE (G3)) as novel hepatocyte-specific siRNA carriers in order to treat transthyretin (TTR)-related familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP), we evaluated the RNAi effect of siRNA complexes with Lac-alpha-CDE (G3) both in vitro and in vivo. Herein, we targeted TTR gene expression because TTR-related FAP was often caused by amyloidogenic TTR (ATTR), which mainly expresses in hepatocytes. Lac-alpha-CDE (G3, average degree of substitution of lactose (DSL) 1.2)/5iRNA complex had a potent RNA, effect against TTR gene expression through adequate physicochemical properties, asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGP-R)-mediated cellular uptake, efficient endosomal escape and the delivery of the siRNA complex to cytoplasm, but not nucleus, with negligible cytotoxicity. Lac-alpha-CDE (G3, DSL 1.2)/siRNA complex had the potential to induce the in vivo RNAi effect after intravenous administration in the liver of mice. The blood chemistry values in the alpha-CDE (G3) and Lac-alpha-CDE (G3, DSL 1.2) systems were almost equivalent to those in the control system (5% mannitol solution). Taken together, these results suggest that Lac-alpha-CDE (G3, DSL 1.2) has the potential for a novel hepatocyte-selective siRNA carrier in vitro and in vivo, and has a possibility as a therapeutic tool for FAP to the liver transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据