4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

In Vivo Evaluation of Doxorubicin-Loaded Polymeric Micelles Targeting Folate Receptors and Early Endosomal pH in Drug-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 1353-1362

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp900021q

关键词

Multidrug-resistance (MDR); pH-sensitive micelle; endosomal pH targeting; folate receptor targeting; ovarian cancer

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA101850-01A1, R01 CA101850-05A1, R01 CA101850, CA 101850] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The second generation of pH-sensitive micelles composed of poly(L-histidine-co-L-phenlyalanine(16 mol %))(MW:5K)-b-PEG(MW:2K) and poly(L-lactic acid)(MW:3K)-b-PEG(MW:2K)-folate (80/20 wt/wt %) was previously optimized by physicochemical and in vitro tests for both folate receptor and early endosomal pH targeting (pH similar to 6.0). In this study, the therapeutic efficacy of the doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded micelles (DOX loading content: 20 wt %) was evaluated using in vivo tests. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) ovarian tumor-xenografted mouse models were employed. The skin-fold dorsal window chamber model was applied for visualization of extravasation and drug retention for the initial one hour after iv injection. Noninvasive imaging followed, providing evidence of drug accumulation in the tumor after the first hour. The biodistribution study further supported the long circulation of the drug carrier, tumor-selective accumulation and intracellular drug delivery. Comprehensive tumor growth inhibition experiments examined the collective efficacy of the pH-sensitive micelles. The micelle formulation effectively suppressed the growth of existing MDR tumors in mice for at least 50 days by three iv injections at a 3-day interval at a dose of 10 mg of DOX/kg. The body weight of the animals treated with the test micelle formulation gradually increased over the experimental time period, rather than decreasing. The micelle formulation was superior to its first generation, which targeted pH 6.8 and folate receptor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据