4.7 Article

Soyasaponins Reduce Inflammation and Improve Serum Lipid Profiles and Glucose Homeostasis in High Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 62, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201800205

关键词

anti-inflammation; hypoglycemic activity; obesity; serum lipid profiles; soyasaponin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81573125, 81102130]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2014A030313313]
  3. Research Start-up Plan of Southern Medical University [CX2016N012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ScopeObesity is linked to a chronic low-grade inflammatory state that contributes to the development of obesity-associated metabolic disorders. The anti-inflammatory activities and mechanisms of soyasaponin monomers (A(1), A(2), and I) have been recently demonstrated in cell models. However, their potential in vivo abilities to reduce chronic inflammation and alleviate metabolic disorders in obese status remain unclear. Methods and resultsHigh fat diet (HFD)-fed obese male C57BL/6J mice are intervened by aspirin (0.1 mgkg(-1) body weight) or 20 mgkg(-1) of soyasaponins A(1), A(2), or I for 8 weeks. Soyasaponins A(1), A(2), and I significantly reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines/mediators in serum, liver, and white adipose tissues (WATs), improve serum lipid profiles, decrease liver cholesterol, triglyceride and steatosis, and promote fecal excretion of cholesterol, triglycerides, and bile acids. Soyasaponins A(1), A(2), and I also decrease IKK/ phosphorylation in liver and WATs and reduce NF-B p65 phosphorylation and CD68 mRNA and protein expression in WATs. Soyasaponins A(1) and A(2) but not I decrease NF-B p65 phosphorylation in liver and adipocytes hypertrophy in WATs. In addition, Soyasaponin A(2) but not A(1) nor I decreases fasting blood glucose and improved insulin resistance. ConclusionSoyasaponins reduce inflammation and improve serum lipid profiles and glucose homeostasis in HFD-induced obese mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据