4.7 Article

Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside counters the response to TNF-alpha of endothelial cells by activating Nrf2 pathway

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 11, 页码 1979-1987

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201300102

关键词

Cellular adaptive response; Cyanidin; Endothelial dysfunction; Nrf2; Oxidative stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ScopeMany dietary phytochemicals have been shown able to prevent a large spectrum of diseases, including cardiovascular disorders, with a mechanism commonly ascribed to an antioxidant effect. However, these in vivo beneficial effects are unlikely to be explained on the base of this mechanism. The discovery of specific genes regulated by the antioxidant responsive element (ARE) affected by antioxidants/electrophiles, led to the hypothesis that some phytochemicals may act as modulators of signal transduction pathways. The aim of the study was to investigate if in vitro pharmacological activation of Nrf2 pathway by cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G) may be involved in its antiatherogenic effects. Methods and resultsHerein, we investigated the in vitro effects of C3G on cell signaling pathways in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) challenged with tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-). Pretreatment with C3G prevented oxidative stress, improved antioxidant systems, and activated Nrf2/ARE pathway, at baseline and after TNF- treatment. Furthermore, we demonstrated the involvement of specific mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) (ERK1/2) in C3G induction of Nrf2/ARE pathway. Finally, the inactivation of ERK1/2 activity by the inhibitor PD98059 abolished the increase of Nrf2 nuclear accumulation induced by C3G, and also increased NF-B p65 nuclear translocation in TNF- challenged cells. ConclusionOur data confirm the hypothesis that natural Nrf2 and HO-1 inducers, such as C3G and other dietary phytochemicals, might be a potential therapeutic strategy to protect vascular system against various stressors preventing several pathological conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据