4.7 Article

Orally administered rubiscolin-6, a δ opioid peptide derived from Rubisco, stimulates food intake via leptomeningeal lipocallin-type prostaglandin D synthase in mice

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 1315-1323

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201200155

关键词

Peptide; Orexigenic effect; d Opioid; L-PGDS; NPY

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. SKYLARK Food Science Institute
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22570081, 24689015, 23380076] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ScopeWe found that rubiscolin-6, a d opioid agonist peptide derived from d-ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), a major protein of green leaves, stimulates food intake after oral administration in mice. We therefore investigated its mechanism. Methods and resultsOrexigenic activity after oral administration of rubiscolin-6 was blocked by central administration of naltrindole, an antagonist for d opioid receptor, suggesting that orally administered rubiscolin-6 stimulates food intake via central d opioid receptor activation. The orexigenic activity of rubiscolin-6 was inhibited by celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor. The hypothalamic mRNA expression of COX-2 and lipocallin-type (L) prostaglandin D synthase (PGDS) was elevated in response to rubiscolin-6 administration. Rubiscolin-6 stimulated food intake in wild-type and hematopoietic (H)-PGDS knockout (KO), but not L-PGDS KO mice. Interestingly, rubiscolin-6 stimulated food intake in L-PGDSflox/Nescre mice, which were deficient in L-PGDS in the brain parenchyma, but not leptomeninges. The orexigenic effect of rubiscolin-6 was abolished by genetic deletion of DP1 receptor for PGD2, and by MK0524 or BIBO3304, an antagonist of DP1 receptor or of Y1 receptor for neuropeptide Y, respectively. ConclusionOrally administered rubiscolin-6 may stimulate food intake through COX-2 and leptomeningeal L-PGDS, followed by DP1 and Y1 receptors, downstream of the central d opioid receptor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据