4.7 Article

Calcium-sensing receptor mediates dietary peptide-induced CCK secretion in enteroendocrine STC-1 cells

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 56, 期 5, 页码 753-760

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201100666

关键词

Calcium-sensing receptor; Cholecystokinin; HEK 293 cells; Protein hydrolysate; STC-1 cells

资金

  1. [23-7124]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23780124] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope Dietary peptides are potent stimulators of cholecystokinin (CCK) secretion, but the sensing mechanism in CCK-producing cells is poorly understood. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) mediates CCK secretion induced by amino acids. We investigated the role of CaSR in CCK secretions induced by various protein hydrolysates (egg albumin, meat, casein, azuki bean, soybean beta-conglycinin, and potato) in the enteroendocrine cell line STC-1. Methods and results CCK secretions in response to these hydrolysates were measured in the STC-1 cells with or without CaSR antagonist (NPS 2143) treatment. Changes in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) in response to protein hydrolysates were measured in Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells transfected with CaSR-expression vector. Protein hydrolysates-induced CCK secretions were decreased by CaSR antagonist treatment, except meat hydrolysate-induced secretion. Protein hydrolysates increased [Ca2+]i in CaSR-transfected HEK 293 cells. CaSR antagonist treatment suppressed low molecular weight fractions of azuki hydrolysate-induced CCK secretion, but the secretion induced by both low and high molecular weight fractions of beta-conglycinin hydrolysate. Further, CCK secretion induced by peptide fractions (>500 Da) derived from various protein hydrolysates were also reduced by CaSR antagonist. Conclusion These results demonstrate that CaSR plays a significant role in sensing various dietary peptides in triggering CCK secretion in enteroendocrine cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据