4.7 Article

Ginger phytochemicals mitigate the obesogenic effects of a high-fat diet in mice: A proteomic and biomarker network analysis

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 S203-S213

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201100193

关键词

6-Gingerol; Correlation network; Obesity; Proteomics; Zerumbone

资金

  1. Korea Food Research Institute
  2. Scottish Executive Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF 220-2008-1-F00013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope: Natural dietary anti-obesogenic phytochemicals may help combat the rising global incidence of obesity. We aimed to identify key hepatic pathways targeted by anti-obsogenic ginger phytochemicals fed to mice. Methods and results: Weaning mice were fed a high-fat diet containing 6-gingerol (HFG), zerumbone (HFZ), a characterized rhizome extract of the ginger-related plant Alpinia officinarum Hance (high fat goryankang, HFGK) or no phytochemicals (high-fat control, HFC) for 6 wks and were compared with mice on a low-fat control diet (LFC). Increased adiposity in the HFC group, compared with the LFC group, was significantly (p<0.05) reduced in the HFG and HFGK groups without food intake being affected. Correlation network analysis, including a novel residuals analysis, was utilized to investigate relationships between liver proteomic data, lipid and cholesterol biomarkers and physiological indicators of adiposity. 6-Gingerol significantly increased plasma cholesterol but hepatic farnesyl diphosphate synthetase, which is involved in cholesterol biosynthesis was decreased, possibly by negative feedback. Acetyl-coenzyme A acyltransferase 1 and enoyl CoA hydratase, which participate in the beta-oxidation of fatty acids were significantly (p<0.05) increased by consumption of phytochemical-supplemented diets. Conclusion: Dietary ginger phytochemicals target cholesterol metabolism and fatty acid oxidation in mice, with anti-obesogenic but also hypercholesterolemic consequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据