4.8 Article

Early infancy microbial and metabolic alterations affect risk of childhood asthma

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 7, 期 307, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aab2271

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [CHM-94316, CMF 108029]
  2. CIHR
  3. Allergy, Genes and Environment (AllerGen) Network of the Centres of Excellence (NCE)
  4. Health Canada
  5. Environment Canada
  6. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
  7. Childhood Asthma Foundation
  8. University of British Columbia
  9. Tula Foundation
  10. Aubrey J. Tingle Professorship in Pediatric Immunology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Asthma is the most prevalent pediatric chronic disease and affects more than 300 million people worldwide. Recent evidence in mice has identified a critical window early in life where gut microbial changes (dysbiosis) are most influential in experimental asthma. However, current research has yet to establish whether these changes precede or are involved in human asthma. We compared the gut microbiota of 319 subjects enrolled in the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) Study, and show that infants at risk of asthma exhibited transient gut microbial dysbiosis during the first 100 days of life. The relative abundance of the bacterial genera Lachnospira, Veillonella, Faecalibacterium, and Rothia was significantly decreased in children at risk of asthma. This reduction in bacterial taxa was accompanied by reduced levels of fecal acetate and dysregulation of enterohepatic metabolites. Inoculation of germ-free mice with these four bacterial taxa ameliorated airway inflammation in their adult progeny, demonstrating a causal role of these bacterial taxa in averting asthma development. These results enhance the potential for future microbe-based diagnostics and therapies, potentially in the form of probiotics, to prevent the development of asthma and other related allergic diseases in children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据