4.6 Article

Inhibition of I kappa B Kinase (IKK) Protects Against Peripheral Nerve Dysfunction of Experimental Diabetes

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 591-598

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-014-8784-8

关键词

Diabetic neuropathy; NF-kappa B; IKK; I kappa B; SC-514

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR, New Delhi, India)
  2. Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India
  3. CSIR-NET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) has been reported as a critical component of signalling mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of a number of inflammatory conditions. Previous reports have shown that anti-inflammatory agents have a protective role in experimental diabetic neuropathy. Here, we assessed whether the inhibition of NF-kappa B cascade via I kappa B kinase (IKK) exerts any neuroprotective effect in experimental diabetic neuropathy. IKK inhibitor SC-514 (1 and 3 mg/kg) was administered daily for 2 weeks starting after 6 weeks of streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Nerve conduction and blood flow were determined by Powerlab and LASER Doppler system, respectively. We evaluated the changes in NF-kappa B, iNOS, and COX-2 expression by Western blotting in sciatic nerve. We found that IKK inhibition with SC-514 increased nerve blood flow and conduction velocity and improved pain threshold in diabetic animals. SC-514 also reduced the expression of NF-kappa B and phosphorylation of IKK beta in the sciatic nerve. Treatment with SC-514 reduced the elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha and IL-6), iNOS, and COX-2. SC-514 reduces the expression of NF-kappa B and its downstream inflammatory components which may be involved in the improvement in nerve functions and pain perception in diabetic neuropathy. From the data of the present study, we suggest that diminution in IKK can be exploited as a drug target to significantly reduce the development of long-term complications of diabetes, particularly neuropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据