4.6 Review

Overexpression of ALS-Associated p.M337V Human TDP-43 in Mice Worsens Disease Features Compared to Wild-type Human TDP-43 Mice

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 22-35

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-013-8427-5

关键词

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Frontotemporal lobar degeneration; TARDBP; Transgenic mice; Ubiquitin

资金

  1. MetLife Foundation Award
  2. Medical Foundation Queen Elisabeth
  3. Foundation for Alzheimer Research (SAO-FRA)
  4. Interuniversity Attraction Poles (IAP) program of the Belgian Science Policy Office
  5. Methusalem Excellence program of the Flemish Government
  6. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)
  7. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT)
  8. University Research Fund of the University of Antwerp, Belgium
  9. IWT
  10. FWO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) are associated with familial forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), while wild-type TDP-43 is a pathological hallmark of patients with sporadic ALS and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Various in vitro and in vivo studies have also demonstrated toxicity of both mutant and wild-type TDP-43 to neuronal cells. To study the potential additional toxicity incurred by mutant TDP-43 in vivo, we generated mutant human TDP-43 (p.M337V) transgenic mouse lines driven by the Thy-1.2 promoter (Mt-TAR) and compared them in the same experimental setting to the disease phenotype observed in wild-type TDP-43 transgenic lines (Wt-TAR) expressing comparable TDP-43 levels. Overexpression of mutant TDP-43 leads to a worsened dose-dependent disease phenotype in terms of motor dysfunction, neurodegeneration, gliosis, and development of ubiquitin and phosphorylated TDP-43 pathology. Furthermore, we show that cellular aggregate formation or accumulation of TDP-43 C-terminal fragments (CTFs) are not primarily responsible for development of the observed disease phenotype in both mutant and wild-type TDP-43 mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据