4.5 Article

Differential localization of LTA synthesis proteins and their interaction with the cell division machinery in Staphylococcus aureus

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 92, 期 2, 页码 273-286

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.12551

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Society Research Grant
  2. ERC [260371, 310987]
  3. BBSRC studentship
  4. Society for General Microbiology
  5. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/71993/2010]
  6. MRC [MR/J006874/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/71993/2010] Funding Source: FCT
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [260371, 310987] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) is an important cell wall component of Gram-positive bacteria. In Staphylococcus aureus it consists of a polyglycerolphosphate-chain that is retained within the membrane via a glycolipid. Using an immunofluorescence approach, we show here that the LTA polymer is not surface exposed in S. aureus, as it can only be detected after digestion of the peptidoglycan layer. S. aureus mutants lacking LTA are enlarged and show aberrant positioning of septa, suggesting a link between LTA synthesis and the cell division process. Using a bacterial two-hybrid approach, we show that the three key LTA synthesis proteins, YpfP and LtaA, involved in glycolipid production, and LtaS, required for LTA backbone synthesis, interact with one another. All three proteins also interacted with numerous cell division and peptidoglycan synthesis proteins, suggesting the formation of a multi-enzyme complex and providing further evidence for the co-ordination of these processes. When assessed by fluorescence microscopy, YpfP and LtaA fluorescent protein fusions localized to the membrane while the LtaS enzyme accumulated at the cell division site. These data support a model whereby LTA back-bone synthesis proceeds in S. aureus at the division site in co-ordination with cell division, while glycolipid synthesis takes place throughout the membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据