4.5 Article

Flow cytometry-based enrichment for cell shape mutants identifies multiple genes that influence Helicobacter pylori morphology

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 90, 期 4, 页码 869-883

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.12405

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institute of Health [R01AI054423, R01AI082026, K99AG042487, P30CA015704]
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program
  3. Jane Coffin Childs Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. BBSRC [BB/I020012/1]
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I020012/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/I020012/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The helical cell shape of Helicobacter pylori is highly conserved and contributes to its ability to swim through and colonize the viscous gastric mucus layer. A multi-faceted peptidoglycan (PG) modification programme involving four recently characterized peptidases and two accessory proteins is essential for maintaining H.pylori's helicity. To expedite identification of additional shape-determining genes, we employed flow cytometry with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to enrich a transposon library for bacterial cells with altered light scattering profiles that correlate with perturbed cell morphology. After a single round of sorting, 15% of our clones exhibited a stable cell shape defect, reflecting 37-fold enrichment. Sorted clones with straight rod morphology contained insertions in known PG peptidases, as well as an insertion in csd6, which we demonstrated has ld-carboxypeptidase activity and cleaves monomeric tetrapeptides in the PG sacculus, yielding tripeptides. Other mutants had only slight changes in helicity due to insertions in genes encoding MviN/MurJ, a protein possibly involved in initiating PG synthesis, and the hypothetical protein HPG27_782. Our findings demonstrate FACS robustly detects perturbations of bacterial cell shape and identify additional PG peptide modifications associated with helical cell shape in H.pylori.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据