4.5 Article

Interplay between predicted inner-rod and gatekeeper in controlling substrate specificity of the type III secretion system

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 87, 期 6, 页码 1183-1199

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.12158

关键词

-

资金

  1. 'Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique - Fonds national Belge de la Recherche Scientifique' (FRS-FNRS) [F.3.4556.11]
  2. European Community [261742]
  3. Belgian Fonds National de Recherches Industrielles et Agronomiques (FRIA)
  4. European Community
  5. Fonds Defay
  6. Alice and David Van Buuren foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The type III secretion apparatus (T3SA) is a multi-protein complex central to the virulence of many Gram-negative pathogens. Currently, the mechanisms controlling the hierarchical addressing of needle subunits, translocators and effectors to the T3SA are still poorly understood. In Shigella, MxiC is known to sequester effectors within the cytoplasm prior to receiving the activation signal from the needle. However, molecules involved in linking the needle and MxiC are unknown. Here, we demonstrate a molecular interaction between MxiC and the predicted inner-rod component MxiI suggesting that this complex plugs the T3SA entry gate. Our results suggest that MxiIMxiC complex dissociation facilitates the switch in secretion from translocators to effectors. We identified MxiCF206S variant, unable to interact with MxiI, which exhibits a constitutive secretion phenotype although it remains responsive to induction. Moreover, we identified the mxiIQ67A mutant that only secretes translocators, a phenotype that was suppressed by coexpression of the MxiCF206S variant. We demonstrated the interaction between MxiI and MxiC homologues in Yersinia and Salmonella. Lastly, we identified an interaction between MxiC and chaperone IpgC which contributes to understanding how translocators secretion is regulated. In summary, this study suggests the existence of a widely conserved T3S mechanism that regulates effectors secretion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据