4.5 Article

Contribution of the glycolytic flux and hypoxia adaptation to efficient biofilm formation by Candida albicans

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 80, 期 4, 页码 995-1013

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07626.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [DEA20080713005]
  2. NPARI consortium [LSHE-CT-2006-037692]
  3. Institut Pasteur [PTR50]
  4. Ministere de la Recherche et de la Technologie (PRFMMIP, 'Reseau Infections Fongiques')
  5. European Commission [QLK2-2000-00795, MRTN-CT-2003-504148, PITN-GA-2008-214004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>The fungal pathogen Candida albicans forms therapeutically challenging biofilms on biomedical implants. Using a transcript profiling approach genes whose expression is favoured upon biofilm growth compared with planktonic growth have been previously identified. Knock-out mutants for 38 of these genes were constructed, six of which showed a specific defect in biofilm formation. Among these genes, TYE7 that encodes a transcriptional activator of glycolytic genes in planktonic and biofilm growth conditions was identified as being required for the cohesiveness of biofilms. Biofilms formed by the tye7 Delta knock-out mutant showed a hyperfilamentous morphology, and growth of this mutant on solid medium under hypoxia was also associated with the production of hyphae. Similar to TYE7 inactivation, inhibition of glycolysis or ATP synthesis using oxalate or an uncoupler, respectively, triggered morphogenesis when a wild-type strain was grown under hypoxia. These treatments also induced the formation of weakly cohesive, hyper-filamentous biofilms by a wild-type strain. Our data indicate that a hypoxic environment is generated within C. albicans biofilms and that continued biofilm development requires a Tye7p-dependent upregulation of glycolytic genes necessary to adapt to hypoxia and prevent uncontrolled hyphal formation. Thus, adaptation to hypoxia is an integral component of biofilm formation in C. albicans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据