4.5 Article

Deletion of alternative pathways for reductant recycling in Thermococcus kodakarensis increases hydrogen production

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 81, 期 4, 页码 897-911

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07734.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1F32-GM073336, GM53185]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen (H(2)) production by Thermococcus kodakarensis compares very favourably with the levels reported for the most productive algal, fungal and bacterial systems. T. kodakarensis can also consume H(2) and is predicted to use several alternative pathways to recycle reduced cofactors, some of which may compete with H(2) production for reductant disposal. To explore the reductant flux and possible competition for H(2) production in vivo, T. kodakarensis TS517 was mutated to precisely delete each of the alternative pathways of reductant disposal, H(2) production and consumption. The results obtained establish that H(2) is generated predominantly by the membrane-bound hydrogenase complex (Mbh), confirm the essential role of the SurR (TK1086p) regulator in vivo, delineate the roles of sulfur (S degrees) regulon proteins and demonstrate that preventing H(2) consumption results in a substantial net increase in H(2) production. Constitutive expression of TK1086 (surR) from a replicative plasmid restored the ability of T. kodakarensis TS1101 (Delta TK1086) to grow in the absence of S degrees and stimulated H(2) production, revealing a second mechanism to increase H(2) production. Transformation of T. kodakarensis TS1101 with plasmids that express SurR variants constructed to direct the constitutive synthesis of the Mbh complex and prevent expression of the S degrees regulon was only possible in the absence of S degrees and, under these conditions, the transformants exhibited wild-type growth and H(2) production. With S degrees present, they grew slower but synthesized more H(2) per unit biomass than T. kodakarensis TS517.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据