4.5 Article

The twin arginine protein transport pathway exports multiple virulence proteins in the plant pathogen Streptomyces scabies

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 252-271

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07206.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. CEU [LHSG-CT-2004-005257]
  2. BBSRC [BB/F009224/1]
  3. MRC
  4. Society for General Microbiology
  5. National Research Initiative of the United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service [2008-35319-19202]
  6. BBSRC [BB/F009429/1, BB/F009224/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F009224/1, BB/F009429/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Streptomyces scabies is one of a group of organisms that causes the economically important disease potato scab. Analysis of the S. scabies genome sequence indicates that it is likely to secrete many proteins via the twin arginine protein transport (Tat) pathway, including several proteins whose coding sequences may have been acquired through horizontal gene transfer and share a common ancestor with proteins in other plant pathogens. Inactivation of the S. scabies Tat pathway resulted in pleiotropic phenotypes including slower growth rate and increased permeability of the cell envelope. Comparison of the extracellular proteome of the wild type and Delta tatC strains identified 73 predicted secretory proteins that were present in reduced amounts in the tatC mutant strain, and 47 Tat substrates were verified using a Tat reporter assay. The Delta tatC strain was almost completely avirulent on Arabidopsis seedlings and was delayed in attaching to the root tip relative to the wild-type strain. Genes encoding 14 candidate Tat substrates were individually inactivated, and seven of these mutants were reduced in virulence compared with the wild-type strain. We conclude that the Tat pathway secretes multiple proteins that are required for full virulence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据