4.5 Article

Elongator function in tRNA wobble uridine modification is conserved between yeast and plants

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 5, 页码 1082-1094

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07163.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB 648]
  2. Sachsen-Anhalt federal graduate programme
  3. BBSRC [BB/F019106/1]
  4. Swedish Cancer Foundation [07 0637]
  5. Swedish Research Council [621-2006-4269]
  6. Bernhard and Signe Backstrom Foundation [223-438-07]
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F019106/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. BBSRC [BB/F019106/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Based on studies in yeast and mammalian cells the Elongator complex has been implicated in functions as diverse as histone acetylation, polarized protein trafficking and tRNA modification. Here we show that Arabidopsis mutants lacking the Elongator subunit AtELP3/ELO3 have a defect in tRNA wobble uridine modification. Moreover, we demonstrate that yeast elp3 and elp1 mutants expressing the respective Arabidopsis Elongator homologues AtELP3/ELO3 and AtELP1/ELO2 assemble integer Elongator complexes indicating a high degree of structural conservation. Surprisingly, in vivo complementation studies based on Elongator-dependent tRNA nonsense suppression and zymocin tRNase toxin assays indicated that while AtELP1 rescued defects of a yeast elp1 mutant, the most conserved Elongator gene AtELP3, failed to complement an elp3 mutant. This lack of complementation is due to incompatibility with yeast ELP1 as coexpression of both plant genes in an elp1 elp3 yeast mutant restored Elongator's tRNA modification function in vivo. Similarly, AtELP1, not ScELP1 also supported partial complementation by yeast-plant Elp3 hybrids suggesting that AtElp1 has less stringent sequence requirements for Elp3 than ScElp1. We conclude that yeast and plant Elongator share tRNA modification roles and propose that this function might be conserved in Elongator from all eukaryotic kingdoms of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据