4.5 Article

Role and mechanism of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C in survival and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 809-826

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06310.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHMRC [352354]
  2. Endeavour International Postgraduate Research Scholarship
  3. International Postgraduate Award
  4. Postgraduate Scholarship in Fungal Pathogenesis
  5. Millennium Foundation Stipend Enhancement Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phospholipase B1 (Plb1) is secreted after release from its glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor and is implicated in initiation and dissemination of infection of the pathogenic fungus, Cryptococcus neoformans. To investigate the role of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) in Plb1 secretion, we identified two putative PI-PLC-encoding genes in C. neoformans var. grubii (PLC1 and PLC2), and created Delta plc1 and Delta plc2 deletion mutants. In Delta plc1, which expressed less PI-PLC activity than wild type (WT), three major cryptococcal virulence traits, Plb1 secretion, melanin production and growth at host temperature (37 degrees C) were abolished and absence of Plb1 secretion coincided with Plb1 accumulation in plasma membranes. In addition, Delta plc1 cell walls were defective, as indicated by cell clumping and irregular morphology, slower growth and an inability to activate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in the presence of cell wall-perturbing agents. In contrast to Delta plc2, which was as virulent as WT, Delta plc1 was avirulent in mice and exhibited attenuated killing of Caenorhabditis elegans at 25 degrees C, demonstrating that mechanism(s) independent of the 37 degrees C growth defect contribute to the virulence composite. We conclude that Plc1 is a central regulator of cryptococcal virulence, acting through the protein kinase C/MAPK pathway, that it regulates release of Plb1 from the plasma membrane and is a candidate antifungal drug target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据