4.5 Article

Novel ultrastructures of Treponema primitia and their implications for motility

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 67, 期 6, 页码 1184-1195

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06120.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R37 AI016478, R01 AI067548-01, R01 AI067548-02, AI016478, R01 AI067548, R01 AI016478, R01 AI067548-03] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [F31 EB004179, F31 EB 004179] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [P01 GM066521, P01 GM066521-01] Funding Source: Medline
  4. PHS HHS [P01 G66521] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Members of the bacterial phylum Spirochaetes are generally helical cells propelled by periplasmic flagella. The spirochete Treponema primitia is interesting because of its mutualistic role in the termite gut, where it is believed to cooperate with protozoa that break down cellulose and produce H-2 as a by-product. Here we report the ultrastructure of T. primitia as obtained by electron cryotomography of intact, frozen-hydrated cells. Several previously unrecognized external structures were revealed, including bowl-like objects decorating the outer membrane, arcades of hook-shaped proteins winding along the exterior and tufts of fibrils extending from the cell tips. Inside the periplasm, cone-like structures were found at each pole. Instead of the single peptidoglycan layer typical of other Gram-negative bacteria, two distinct periplasmic layers were observed. These layers formed a central open space that contained two flagella situated adjacent to each other. In some areas, the inner membrane formed flattened invaginations that protruded into the cytoplasm. High-speed light microscopic images of swimming T. primitia cells showed that cell bodies remained rigid and moved in a helical rather than planar motion. Together, these findings support the 'rolling cylinder' model for T. primitia motility that posits rotation of the protoplasmic cylinder within the outer sheath.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据